Program evaluation proposal

Download the Project Outline for full details about this assignment. Click the title of the assignment to access the rubric. A program evaluation plan provides a framework with which to organize and guide evaluation of instructional program effectiveness.

Three goals drive this assignment:. For this submission, compile the results of the previous assignments into a single document, based on the outline. Assignment Description. Submission Text. Here is my completed program evaluation plan. An initial step in the formation of a team is to decide who will be responsible for planning and implementing evaluation activities. One program staff person should be selected as the lead evaluator to coordinate program efforts.

This person should be responsible for evaluation activities, including planning and budgeting for evaluation, developing program objectives, addressing data collection needs, reporting findings, and working with consultants.

The lead evaluator is ultimately responsible for engaging stakeholders, consultants, and other collaborators who bring the skills and interests needed to plan and conduct the evaluation. Although this staff person should have the skills necessary to competently coordinate evaluation activities, he or she can choose to look elsewhere for technical expertise to design and implement specific tasks. However, developing in-house evaluation expertise and capacity is a beneficial goal for most public health organizations.

The lead evaluator should be willing and able to draw out and reconcile differences in values and standards among stakeholders and to work with knowledgeable stakeholder representatives in designing and conducting the evaluation. Seek additional evaluation expertise in programs within the health department, through external partners e. You can also use outside consultants as volunteers, advisory panel members, or contractors.

External consultants can provide high levels of evaluation expertise from an objective point of view. Important factors to consider when selecting consultants are their level of professional training, experience, and ability to meet your needs. Be sure to check all references carefully before you enter into a contract with any consultant. To generate discussion around evaluation planning and implementation, several states have formed evaluation advisory panels.

Advisory panels typically generate input from local, regional, or national experts otherwise difficult to access. Such an advisory panel will lend credibility to your efforts and prove useful in cultivating widespread support for evaluation activities.

Evaluation team members should clearly define their respective roles. Informal consensus may be enough; others prefer a written agreement that describes who will conduct the evaluation and assigns specific roles and responsibilities to individual team members. Either way, the team must clarify and reach consensus on the:. This manual is organized by the six steps of the CDC Framework.

Each chapter will introduce the key questions to be answered in that step, approaches to answering those questions, and how the four evaluation standards might influence your approach. The main points are illustrated with one or more public health examples that are composites inspired by actual work being done by CDC and states and localities.

Together, they build a house over a multi-week period. At the end of the construction period, the home is sold to the family using a no-interest loan. Lead poisoning is the most widespread environmental hazard facing young children, especially in older inner-city areas. Even at low levels, elevated blood lead levels EBLL have been associated with reduced intelligence, medical problems, and developmental problems.

The main sources of lead poisoning in children are paint and dust in older homes with lead-based paint. Public health programs address the problem through a combination of primary and secondary prevention efforts. A typical secondary prevention program at the local level does outreach and screening of high-risk children, identifying those with EBLL, assessing their environments for sources of lead, and case managing both their medical treatment and environmental corrections.

However, these programs must rely on others to accomplish the actual medical treatment and the reduction of lead in the home environment. A common initiative of state immunization programs is comprehensive provider education programs to train and motivate private providers to provide more immunizations.

A typical program includes a newsletter distributed three times per year to update private providers on new developments and changes in policy, and provide a brief education on various immunization topics; immunization trainings held around the state conducted by teams of state program staff and physician educators on general immunization topics and the immunization registry; a Provider Tool Kit on how to increase immunization rates in their practice; training of nursing staff in local health departments who then conduct immunization presentations in individual private provider clinics; and presentations on immunization topics by physician peer educators at physician grand rounds and state conferences.

Minimalist theory of evaluation: The least theory that practice requires. American Journal of Evaluation ; Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, Study of participatory research in health promotion: Review and recommendations for the development of participatory research in health promotion in Canada.

Ottawa, Canada : Royal Society of Canada , Health promotion evaluation: Recommendations to policy-makers: Report of the WHO European working group on health promotion evaluation.

Public health in America. Fall January 1, Ten organizational practices of public health: A historical perspective. American Journal of Preventive Medicine ;11 6 Suppl The program evaluation standards: How to assess evaluations of educational programs. The PRC program is a national network of 24 academic research centers committed to prevention research and the ability to translate that research into programs and policies.

Each participating district will— submit a completed Plan of Action by the End-of Year 1. The DLT will use data to modify their actions in Years to increase the effectiveness of the model in their district. Track number of students admitted and retained in the MAT program. Collect and analyze the student course evaluations for each course in the MAT program. Conduct and analyze an exit interview with any student leaving the MAT program prior to receiving their degree.

A major goal of the MAT program is to enable teachers to become mathematics leaders. They will a gain knowledge of mathematical strategies for meeting the learning needs of diverse communities; b gain skills in facilitating teacher professional learning communities PLCs , c provide structures and resources for curriculum alignment, standards-based instruction, problem-based learning, mathematics discourse and formative assessments.

Each MAT program participant will— complete and submit a professional development log documenting any and all training they have provided during the school year. Goal II b: Increase the quality, quantity and diversity of mathematics teachers. MAT graduates will become math leaders to support mathematics teaching and learning in their districts. Benchmarks: Evaluation: Students in the MAT program who are classroom teachers will serve as mentors for pre-service teachers and offer classroom experiences and opportunities to gain further mathematical knowledge needed for teaching.

Track hours for pre-service teachers being mentored by MAT students. Conduct focus groups with pre-service teachers at the end of every semester.